[Write On!]

Search Write On!

Neurosis Part II

by sabeth
Posted to Diaries, Diary on Tue Jun 21, 2005 at 04:34:28 AM PST
[Print]
It's been a while. More musings, mainly to myself, on what I'm doing wrong.

I did a word search through my rough draft and I find the word "remember" comes up far too often. Well, most of what's written so far is flashback, so what do you expect. But there's got to be a more elegant way to do that. I'm sure there is.

I've been reading Saturday by Ian McEwan. I'm sort of tempted to steal his way of solving the whole present-story/backstory problem. He writes the main storyline in the present tense, tracking the protagonist closely as he goes through his day. It's the perfect approach for what he's doing: in the present tense, you're in that very moment being described, with no foreknowledge of the future, not even the next second. The reader experiences the day just as the character does. Flashbacks, whether it's earlier in the day or the protagonist's childhood, are handled in the past tense, often without any noticeable break other than the change in verb form. No clumsy signals like "He thinks back to when...." No preponderance of the pluperfect.

I'm wary of imitation though (not because of being unoriginal - I'm taking it as given that what I'm doing is not terribly original). When I'm taken with someone's style I have a tendency to go too far in echoing their voice. In high school, I wrote stories and essays where my teachers would know instantly, "You've been reading Vonnegut," or "You're trying to do a Calvino." My writing voice is already too changeable. A bad habit, like picking up accents when talking to people.

I do need to flesh out the present-day story, which *cough* I never seem to get around to doing. Getting out of the habit of wallowing in backstory would also help with the "remember" problem. I have a sort-of beginning and a sort-of end, and a very fuzzy middle, as in how do they get from here to there? I should just start writing it and see what happens.

On the other hand, I think I've been doing a bit better with the things I mentioned last time. Well, I don't know that I'm any better at physical description, but at least I've got a clearer image of them - it just doesn't seem to come out very much during those initial spurts of writing. I have to let more of that leak through in revision.

I feel less self-conscious about the choreography, though sometimes it's because I'm skipping it altogether. At least people don't look at each other gratuitously so much anymore.

I've dumped a lot of speech tags. I could probably stand to cut a few more. The draft is heavy on dialogue, it's just too easy to fall into. At times it feels like disembodied voices talking to each other. (Maybe I should start writing screenplays for Lost or something, flashbacks every episode and a framing story no one understands or really expects to.) I need more good choreography and setting.

Also, I ought to write more of the 3rd-person narrative from her POV to balance out the 1st-person journal entries from him (that also goes along with the focusing on the framing story). And his parts should probably sound more journal-like. He's sort of more fun to write, but that's not fair to her, or the story in general.

Anyway, I need to get the discipline to start wrangling these scattered elements into some sort of coherent shape, at least so I have a clearer idea of what it looks like, and where it needs to go. All right, consider that the goal of the next few months.

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:
Related Links
Display: Sort:
Neurosis Part II | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
maybe an odd question (3.00/0) (#1)
by janra on Fri Jun 24, 2005 at 03:35:13 PM PST
If you're spending all this time on the backstory instead of the current story, do you think the backstory might be the real story?
--
Who needs to be big and burly when you can just apply physics?
not odd (3.00/0) (#2)
by sabeth on Mon Jun 27, 2005 at 05:13:28 AM PST
The backstory is at least as important as the present-day storyline (unlike Saturday, which is more clearly the story of one day, with flashbacks). It's just that in the structure I've set up, it sort of needs (I guess I should be careful with that word) these parallel threads running through it. Part of what I want to do is incorporate the backstory more seamlessly instead of turning on a clunky flashback switch, while making it clear to the reader what's happening. Besides, any way I structure it, even if I just tell the whole story from the beginning straight through and abandon all my too-clever tricks, what happens in the "present" would still be the climax this is all leading up to -- so I have to work that out and resolve it somehow, no matter what.

I used to be better about advancing the various storylines and dealing with how they interact with each other, but I've gotten lazier about it lately. I also have a vague idea how the pieces are going to join up, but I need to actually try them out that way and see whether it actually works the way I thought it would, or if I'll learn anything new in the process. (It sort of reminds me of a high school science project where my partner and I were doing a presentation on plate tectonics, and we painstakingly cut out little oaktag outlines of the continents so we could put them together and show how it all used to be one land mass. Needless to say, they did not fit together so neatly, not even South America and Africa, even though on the map they look like they should.)

--ich sage nicht, was ich will, sondern was die Sprache will--
[ Parent ]

Other voices (3.00/0) (#3)
by Persephone on Tue Jul 26, 2005 at 08:53:49 PM PST
In your entry you mentioned how you have this bad habit of too easily adopting other voices. This is in and of itself not a bad thing. You can use it to enrich your text. At least now you are aware that you have this tendency. Instead of chiding yourself for it, use your gift of mimicry to your advantage. Be creative with it. Sometimes embracing a foible as something uniquely yours is much more fruitful than trying to fight it.

mimicry (3.00/0) (#4)
by sabeth on Fri Aug 05, 2005 at 10:59:15 AM PST
True, it's not necessarily a bad thing. Being able to adopt voices almost means a certain flexibility of style (instead of "this is The Way I Write/speak/etc"). And echoes or allusions to another work can add to a text, as well, as long as it's not too derivative (or purely derivative). There are actually at least two competing narrative voices in the story with their own styles and tendencies (well, this is the idea, anyway), not to mention the more literal voices of characters as recorded in dialogue. So I just have to channel the impulse in the right directions :)

--ich sage nicht, was ich will, sondern was die Sprache will--
[ Parent ]
Neurosis Part II | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort: