The same is true of stories written today, we can't distance ourselves from our own time and our own ideas about the world. Witness William Gibson's "Neuromancer", some of its concepts seem pretty dated (the net as pictured by Gibson), but for its time it seemed modern, but that doesn't make the story less enjoyable. The same can be said of Neal Stephenson's "Snow Crash", its "Metaverse" was groundbreaking back then, and the phrase stuck, but the metaverse was pretty unimaginiative as opposed to what'll be.

Those two stories show that we are coloured by our own age.

Bringing in the latest and greatest techonology into stories is natural. If you write of someone living today, use current events, use the things you know. Don't try to place your characters in an indetermined age. You won't be able to do that. Keep the themes and characters timeless, let their stories reflect something which is true about humanity, regardless of which age we live in.

We can recognize ourselves in literature which is thousands of years old, even though their lives were totally different and the stories reflect that.

Think of how exciting it will be to read the best literature of our age a thousand years from now? Someone is going to read about "Commodore 64" and "Atari" computers and wonder at how we could make do with such primitive ways of entertainment.

And yet, they'll still read books, and I hope that the works mentioned in the first paragraph will make it through to those readers. Though, from a story point of view it would be much more poetic if the future would be left to wonder what happened to those wonderful works which are so abundantly referenced in other works from our age, and yet those primary sources disappeared, leaving them to conjectures and wishful thinking...
--
When in doubt,
turn around,
cry and shout

spdyvkng - my homepage

IMHO, any piece of writing is a product of the time it is written in -- that's pretty hard to get around. Even if you set it in some other time period, the period in which you live will color how you look at that other time and / or culture.

My guideline has always been to give loyalty to the story first, and not worry about dating the material. I had to make this decision early on in my first book, which is full of pop-culture references, because that's the kind of environment the characters existed in. Certainly, someone reading it some years down the road will see the material as dated and set in a certain time period, but that's the story I set out to tell. I could just as easily have surrounded them with the popular culture trappings of some other decade, or even century, but I chose not to. (But then I should mention, one of the major themes of the book was, in fact, the influence that the characters' culture had on their personalities. So YMMV.)

My feeling is that if you set out to write a piece of immortal literature that will be understood by generations down the road and put story considerations second, you've already lost to some degree. If you have something transient like a pop-culture reference in your work, look at it and decide if it really belongs there. Does it help set the tone or the mood? Does it lend the story context? Do the characters mention it because it is important to them? If so, it should probably stay in, regardless of other considerations. If it's there because of laziness or doesn't really belong, then scrap it.

Additionally, it's probably nothing to worry about in a first draft scenario either -- when I write characters in a modern setting and get lazy or weary trying to get over a story hump, my dialogue will often descend into quotes from movies and pop-culture cliches. It all gets weeded out in the editing process later.
-------------------------
You're back into the bog.