[Write On!]

Search Write On!

Neologistic Hyphenation

by day
Posted to Craft, Style and Voice on Tue Dec 10, 2002 at 10:39:15 PM PST
[Print]
I'm having trouble formulating a personal heuristic for deciding whether to hyphenate compound words that are not in a dictionary -- i.e. that i'm just basically making up.

The whole business of hyphenation does not seem like it's done logically...


The Chicago Manual of Style FAQ: hyphens and dashes offers ideas...

what i got from it is:

we could formulate: if you're making a compound neologism and none of the parts are suffices or prefices, then use hyphens. But as soon as it enters a dictionary (e.g. schoolmaster) then strip out those needless hyphens.

fairly lame solution.

but what's better? do a joycean juxtaposition of whateverwords make you feel cozywarm? problem with that is it can give rise to slow reading -- hyphens help the parsability of word-recruits, don't you think?

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:
Related Links
Display: Sort:
Neologistic Hyphenation | 4 comments (1 topical, 0 hidden)
good point (none/0) (#1)
by day on Fri Dec 06, 2002 at 02:23:47 PM PST
yes what a bugger... when you're spell-checking a hundred pages and you have to click "replace" or "skip" with downright arbitrariness. it's the hyphenatable words.

if we could figure out some reasonable approach, it would allow for consistency without reprocessing a text that you've already checked!
babelguides <<World Literature in Translation>>

Neologistic Hyphenation | 4 comments (1 topical, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort: